But his confession would never make trial. Whatever Garrow told them, including the details of the murders and the location of the bodies, could not be revealed.
It was similar to a priest and a confessor or a doctor and a patient. Nothing could persuade them to reveal the secret of where the bodies were buried. They drove up to Mineville, New York, to the area that Garrow had described during their last interview. It was near this town that Garrow said he tossed the body of Susan Petz down a mineshaft.
This area was honeycombed with deserted mines leftover from an era when mineworkers dug everywhere in the hills. The two attorneys arrived at the scene in mid-afternoon. It was late August and the weather was hot and humid. It was located at the base of a mountain near the entrance to an abandoned mine. They began their search on foot. For several hours they explored the hills and found nothing. They began to think they were in wrong place. But Francis Belge managed to locate a mineshaft that looked promising.
He lowered himself into the hole while Armani held onto his hand. Using a flashlight, he searched around in the cool darkness 30 thirty feet below the surface. When he came back to the surface, he told Armani he may have found Susan Petz. But he wanted to take pictures. Belge retrieved a Polaroid camera and Belge went back down into the hole.
When he came back up the second time, he was sure. Garrow was right; the body was where he said it was. Now, the lawyers had no doubts: Garrow was a murderer. They discussed what to do with this information. They could not reveal this information to anyone because it would represent a breach of confidentiality and a violation of the code of legal ethics.
They were also bound by law not to reveal what their client had told them. The attorneys also decided that they should go to Syracuse and search for the body of Alicia Hauck. The next day, the two men were on the vast Oakwood Cemetery property in Syracuse, where Garrow said he had hidden the body of a girl he killed back in July. They already knew from newspaper reports that there was a missing year-old girl in Syracuse named Alicia Hauck who vanished while she was walking home from school.
Garrow said that he killed a girl fitting her description near the cemetery and hid her body behind a shed. At first they were unable to locate the remains. The attorneys returned to the jail where they had another interview with Garrow. The next day, Belge returned to Oakwood Cemetery without Armani and instead took a friend. After searching through the bushes for hours, they located the remains of Alicia Hauck.
Her body was in an advanced state of decomposition and partially destroyed by animal activity. It is a quiet community, which depends heavily on summer visitors for economic support. The tourists come from New York City, Albany and other metropolitan areas to enjoy the lakes, hike the wilderness or simply relax in the serene beauty of the Adirondacks. Dozens of cottages and summer homes line the picturesque shores of Lake Pleasant, nestled in a cradle of low lying mountains and hills that are typical in the Hamilton County area.
Security for the trial was of the utmost concern to law enforcement officials since Garrow had already proven his tendency to escape from custody. Dozens of police officers surrounded the tiny court building and snipers were placed strategically around the intersection of Route 8, ready to take out Garrow should he decide to make a break. Some people thought police were overreacting since Garrow was confined to a wheelchair and hardly seemed capable of making an escape.
During his capture on August 9, , he was shot several times. He later claimed his wounds had paralyzed him on one side, though doctors disagreed over the severity of these injuries.
But the trial would go forward nonetheless. After pretrial motions were settled, the decision was made to begin the legal process. Starting on May 9, , more than people were called for jury duty in Hamilton County. Attorneys Belge and Armani scrutinized the pool carefully, mindful of the tremendous amount of publicity generated by the Garrow case.
Local officials were overwhelmed by the reporters who descended upon their community to cover the trial. By early June, a jury was selected that was acceptable to both prosecution and defense.
The trial began on June They all identified Garrow and said he seemed to know exactly what he was doing during the entire time they watched him. Carol Malinowski testified that Garrow spoke to her at length during the ordeal but luckily, did not assault her. The prosecution team, led by Hamilton County D.
William Intemann, also called crime scene technicians who described the campground where the murder took place. Dozens of articles of evidence were introduced, including crime scene photographs of the victim, which graphically portrayed the killing.
One photograph displayed the lifeless body of Domblewski still tied to a tree, slumped over in a brutal execution-type slaying, that could only have been done by a cold-hearted killer. The impression was not lost on the jury. On June 17, after what seemed like an airtight case against a smirking Robert Garrow, who often sat in his wheelchair mechanically taking notes, the defense began its case. Garrow sat in the wheelchair uncomfortably, his heavy, thick frame slumped down, making him appear less threatening.
As he spoke, his dark glasses would sometimes fall below his eyes. He glanced nervously around the courtroom while Francis Belge asked him about his early life in upstate New York. He went on to describe his years on the farm when he was a child, working from dawn to late at night without any rest. Garrow was always on bad terms with his mother and father. The police responded to his house on several occasions to break up fights between him and his drunken father who once attacked the young boy with a crowbar.
At the urging of Belge, Garrow told the jury of having sexual intercourse with the animals on the farm. He said it continued throughout his teenage years and even on other farms where he worked for neighbors.
Garrow told the court of his many problems with the law and of being arrested for crimes like rape, sodomy and burglary. He said that while he was out of jail in Albany he became sexually involved with a male attorney who physically abused him during sex.
He said that he was later arrested for rape in Albany and spent eight years in prison at Auburn and Dannemora where he had sex with the other prisoners. After he got out of prison in , Garrow continued his violent ways. He testified that he committed a series of rapes in the Syracuse area, some with very young girls. He said he would wander the streets at night and when he came upon a good target, he would force the victim in the woods.
During another rape, he abducted a girl who was parked in a car with her boyfriend. He also told the court about the attacks on the two little girls in May Garrow testified he took them to a hilly area in Camillus where he sexually assaulted both victims.
Garrow often gave his testimony in a flat monotone tone as if he were talking about something mundane. He seemed agreeable and cooperative when Belge asked the questions. The attorneys could ask him anything, and he would tell them.
But at times, he was evasive and whenever it suited him, Garrow had memory loss. He frequently contradicted himself, sometimes in the same sentence, and some jurors rolled their eyes during his testimony.
Garrow rocked back and forth in his wheelchair from time to time, rubbing his bad leg as if to remind the jury that he was in pain. Of course, that may have worked against him since the jury knew full well that he was shot while running from the police during an day manhunt.
He pushed his glasses up his nose occasionally and sometimes wiped the perspiration from his face with the back of his hand. He told the court about the killing of Daniel Porter and his girlfriend, Susan Petz, alternately taking the blame for the crime and at other times, minimizing what he had done. I noticed my hand was all bloody, my shirt was all torn. As he continued with his testimony, he recalled another murder.
Garrow stared straight ahead, as if in a trance. He rubbed that portion of his leg where fragments of police bullets still remained. She was strangled with a rope, or with a piece of wire or something. Her name was Alicia Hauck and her body had finally been found in December , months before the trial started. After he killed her, Garrow said, he ran to downtown Syracuse.
He went back to his car and then drove home where he had dinner with his wife, Edith. Then Garrow informed the jury of how he had told both his attorneys, Francis Belge and Frank Armani, the details of each of these murders and where the bodies of the victims could be found.
He said these conversations took place months ago and that the attorneys had brought him photos of the dead girls for him to identify. For three days, Garrow testified to a series of seven rapes and four murders whose details both shocked and angered the court. Whenever he seemed like he was coming to the end, he would remember another crime or another rape and go into long, convoluted details about the event.
However, it was an unrealistic expectation because the truth was obvious to nearly everyone: Garrow both knew the difference between right and wrong and was aware of the consequences of his actions. If a defendant meets those criteria, he cannot be insane. On June 27, , with both the prosecution and the defense finished with the presentation of their case, Judge Marthen charged the jury. Although Garrow was obviously a deranged individual, his attorneys had offered no proof that he did not know that killing a human being was wrong.
He had run from the police, which indicated guilt, and testified that he had killed before. He also said he had concealed the bodies and expected to go to jail for what he had done. All these facts pointed to a man who knew that murder was wrong. After only two hours of deliberations, the seven-man, five-woman jury reached a verdict. At p. Garrow was found guilty of murder in the first-degree. He accepted the decision without any apparent emotion and was quickly wheeled out of the courtroom after the jury was polled.
On July 1, Garrow was sentenced to 25 years to life. Garrow was transported to upstate Clinton prison, in Dannemora near the Canadian border. But his physical condition may not have been as severe as he made it out to be. A physical exam, conducted before the trial, indicated Garrow was malingering and exaggerating his injuries for his own benefit. In an affidavit filed February 21, , Doctor Frank Dick wrote his findings. But for attorneys Francis Belge and Frank Armani, the trouble was just beginning.
The public fury over their conduct in the defense of Garrow grew into a firestorm following the revelations that the two lawyers had withheld the location of the bodies of Susan Petz and Alicia Hauck. A state court directed the state bar association to investigate the behavior of both lawyers during the defense of their client, not only for ethical violations but for criminal conduct.
The press continued to report the story and the issue became part of a national dialogue on the ethics and morals of defense attorneys. Everywhere, it seemed, controversy followed Belge and Armani. In July , Onondaga District Attorney Jon Holcombe announced that a grand jury would probe the conduct of both lawyers to ascertain if their behavior constituted a crime.
But Belge and Armani had supporters as well. They operated in accordance with the highest traditions of the legal profession. Professor David Mellinkoff, author of The Conscience of a Lawyer and an expert on legal ethics, explained the complexities of the issues. The bodies of Susan Petz and Alicia Hauck were considered evidence and, during their visits to their gravesites, Belge and Armani may have disturbed the crime scenes. At least the families of the victims could have closure and the victims would have proper interment.
But according to some legal experts, even that would have been a violation of oath. And evidence, such as hairs, fibers or blood gathered at the scene of the crime could have been used against their client. When Armani testified, he told the panel how the case had affected him personally.
And if there was any way I could have, I would have told Mr. But my hands were tied. And as a result, this thing has cost me dearly. My law practice failed. But there was nothing else I could do. Please believe that! On February 25, , Francis Belge was indicted by the grand jury for health law violations pertaining to a speedy burial. Given the issues involved, it seemed a trivial charge. The same jury refused to indict Armani on any charges and he was exonerated.
On the day the decision was announced, Armani suffered a heart attack. They took to carrying loaded guns in their briefcases and lived in fear for many years that someone would take revenge for their stubborn defense of a ruthless killer like Robert Garrow. Their respective law practices crumbled. Clients and friends deserted them. Debts piled up. Belge gave up his practice and moved to Florida.
Armani stuck it out and, over the years, he was able to salvage his practice. Garrow spent the first few years of incarceration at Dannemora and Auburn Prison. In both institutions, he claimed that he received unfair treatment and was the victim of police brutality at the hands of the New York State Police. He also said that he was partially paralyzed by gunshot wounds he suffered during his capture in Under hypnosis by Armani while at a Plattsburgh hospital, Garrow told the lawyers where to find the bodies of Pelz and of Alicia Hauck, a year-old girl he had raped and killed that July 11 in Syracuse.
At the time, Hauck was a missing person, but suspected by authorities of being a runaway. The lawyers offered to provide the information as a potential plea-bargaining chip for a reduced charge against Garrow. When prosecutors angrily rejected the offer, they felt bound by attorney-client confidentiality not to disclose what they knew. Armani and Belge were in their mids at the time, and the controversy would follow them for life.
Armani is still alive at age 93, and today is seen by many lawyers and law students as a hero, for standing up for the principle of attorney-client confidentiality. The story of the manhunt is a terrifying tale in its own right, as Garrow used his wiles to break into hunting camps and survive in the woods despite roadblocks and searches. He was eventually able to steal a car, run a roadblock and make his way 60 miles north from Speculator to Mineville, his hometown in the eastern Adirondacks.
Tracy has a small personal connection to the search. His father had a hunting camp in Speculator, and as an 8-year-old Tracy remembers the evidence he saw after police told them Garrow had broken in. I also remember how much fear permeated our small village of Fort Edward and the surrounding areas during this time. The search for Garrow, overseen by state police, was the most extensive and expensive the state had seen up to that time.
On Aug. Using a shotgun, LeBlanc hit him in the ankle, back and shoulder. Garrow would claim paralysis — but many in law enforcement believed he was faking. His escape would prove them right. As it turned out, Garrow had kidnapped Pelz after murdering Porter. He drove her north to Mineville, where he raped and killed her.
Armani had lost a brother. He was much younger, he was four years younger than me. Brenna Farrell: He was an Air Force pilot. Brenna Farrell: And in his plane went down and he was lost at sea. So after that, Armani said his mother, she'd be up at night crying, she would go to bed at night-. Brenna Farrell: Because you can't, you don't really know but you know.
I can understand it. Brenna Farrell: And that's partly why this was so hard for Armani, because when that plea deal fell apart, that was his chance to try to get this information to the families. When the plea fell through, he didn't have any other options for sharing that information.
He was stuck. Jad Abumrad: What So what happens next? Brenna Farrell: So they have to go to trial, and that means that Armani and Belge have to knuckle down to try to present an insanity defense.
Meanwhile, Armani, he said he couldn't sleep, he was having nightmares. Brenna Farrell: Go sit at the kitchen table drinking coffee and just waiting for the morning paper to come, because he was just alone with it.
He was alone with this secret, and he knew at that moment, the police are trying to find these girls. He knows that the parents are holding out hope that they might still be alive. You're hurting people, so you begin to wonder, "Am I in the right profession? You know, we'll make an anonymous call. Brenna Farrell: Did you ever think of that? Brenna Farrell: And why didn't you? I don't know. Brenna Farrell: No. According to him, no. Brenna Farrell: And then in December of , five months after the girls disappear, their bodies happen to be discovered within two weeks of each other.
Susan's body is discovered by two kids who were playing up in the mines. Alicia I guess I think a student from Syracuse University, which is right next door to the cemetery, is walking through and stumbles upon her, and so she's discovered then too. Jim Tracy: And then-. Brenna Farrell: Six months later. Jim Tracy: In the summer of Sharon Smith: Opening day of the trial might be one of the most significant, even though Brenna Farrell: Robert Garrow's trial.
Jim Tracy: For the murder of Phil Domblewski. Sharon Smith: Robert Garrow's primary line of defense will apparently be not guilty by reason of insanity. Brenna Farrell: So in order to make that case, what they decide to do is to put Garrow on the stand. Jim Tracy: And Garrow would tell his whole life story. Jim Tracy: Including all these murders and all these rapes.
Brenna Farrell: So the trial opens, the courtroom is jam-packed. Prosecution starts, they have a really good case, they've got a good lawyer from Syracuse that joined to help the guy from Hamilton County, and then it's the time for the defense to start their case. Garrow gets on the stand and he starts telling his life story, and it's horrible. Severe beatings and abused by his parents.
Very little education, he basically gets sent off to a farm to work like as an indentured servant when he's seven, slaughtering bulls when he's eight years old, weird stuff like that.
He starts drinking blood, having sex with the animals, and then he starts admitting to a series of rapes throughout his adult life. Brenna Farrell: And he admits to killing Alicia and Susan. And what happens next, nobody's quite sure if it was a slip-up or if maybe it was on purpose, but when Garrow's talking about Susan Petz, Belge says, "Is that the one I found? Jad Abumrad: "Is that the one I found? Jim Tracy: So the cat was out of the bag then.
Brenna Farrell: The next day, Belge and Armani hold a press conference to try to explain why they hadn't told anyone. Speaker Today in a surprise announcement, Robert Garrow's defense attorney-. Brenna Farrell: Because they had this duty to protect their client's secrets. Speaker Said they knew the body was here, and they had seen it. Jim Tracy: But. Brenna Farrell: Everyone is disgusted. Jim Tracy: There was columns written, editorials written, letters to the editor. Speaker There is just no way in the world you're going to convince your average non-lawyer-.
Jim Tracy: Everybody turned against them. That this is anything short of shabby subversion of the law and of justice. Brenna Farrell: Pretty soon, one of the prosecutors let out that Armani and Belge had actually tried to use these dead girls as leverage for Garrow. Jim Tracy: The headlines in the Syracuse papers would say, "Bodies used as pawns in a game of law. Brenna Farrell: Armani was getting death threats in the mail. Brenna Farrell: People calling, saying stuff like, "How can you live with yourself, I'm going to kill you.
Brenna Farrell: At one point he finds a dead fish in his car. His wife finds an unlit Molotov cocktail in the backyard, he started to carry a-. Brenna Farrell: He kept a shotgun in the car, he kept one in the house. That was the worst moment of my life. I had some horrible thoughts. He's given the maximum sentence, he's given 25 years to life in a maximum-security prison. Brenna Farrell: How did that feel? Were you-. It's over with. Brenna Farrell: But then-. Speaker It is up to the grand jury itself in their investigation to determine which charges they should bring against the two attorneys.
Brenna Farrell: Pretty soon after the verdict, Armani and Belge learn that they could be facing criminal charges. No one's really sure exactly what those might be, but it could be something like tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, or-. Speaker The state's public health law and provision that says that a body must be given a quick and decent burial.
Brenna Farrell: And on top of that Speaker One of the cutting questions and the one that has raised the greatest amount of controversy is the one over the attorney-client privilege.
Brenna Farrell: There was an ethical complaint filed against Armani and Belge. So basically they were then facing disbarment. And the investigation into the ethical complaint, that would drag on several years.
Jim Tracy: Belge started drinking heavily, abandoned his law practice and moved to Florida. Armani toughed it out, but he suffered. Brenna Farrell: No one wanted him as a lawyer anymore.
Brenna Farrell: He was just barely getting by for a little while, I think. Brenna Farrell: In fact, he has a heart attack while this is all going on. Brenna Farrell: But eventually, the criminal charges are dropped and the ethical complaint is dismissed, and the reason, in the opinion of the court and the state bar, is that what Belge and Armani did was right. What they did was good. Lisa Lerman: Exactly. Brenna Farrell: According to the law. Lisa Lerman: And my view is Frank Armani is a real-life hero.
I always say, you know, people so admire Atticus Finch and the difference between Atticus Finch and Frank Armani is that Armani is a real person.
Brenna Farrell: And Lisa told me about this panel she organized back in It was for the American Bar Association, a big conference on professional responsibility.
Lisa Lerman: And there were about people in the room. Brenna Farrell: Most of them lawyers, and they were there to watch, onstage, the featured speaker Frank Armani. Lisa Lerman: And it was a love feast. Brenna Farrell: What does that feel like, and did you ever think you'd get to that point when you were in the midst of the hardest parts? Never dreamed that I don't think I was a hero, I just was a lawyer that did his job.
I mean, I was a good lawyer, at least I thought so. Speaker All right, everybody, this is Brenna Farrell. Brenna Farrell: And now, over 40 years later, this case-. Speaker Let's talk about-. Brenna Farrell Speaker The Dead Bodies Case. Brenna Farrell: It's taught in law schools across the country. Lisa Lerman: Everybody teaches the case. It's like a touchstone. Speaker What do people think, what do people think?
Brenna Farrell: So I went to a couple of classes. I went to one legal ethics class, and I also went to a criminal defense class here in New York that was being taught at Fordham.
Speaker Want to just stand up. Speaker I agree. His duty is to his client, he represents his client's best interests-. Brenna Farrell: And in sitting in on these classes and then talking to law professors, I think one of the reasons that this case is taught so widely is because professors can point it, they can point to a real human being at the center of a really tough legal situation and they can say, "In this situation, this is what a lawyer should do.
This is what a lawyer should be. Brenna Farrell: So from the moment I started thinking about this story, I always wanted to talk to the families involved, which proved really difficult. I wrote letters to both families, and I made a bunch of phone calls, and understandably no one wanted to talk to me. But eventually I did start corresponding with a family member of one of the victims. And she initially didn't want to go on the record, but we emailed, and after a few phone calls she ended up changing her mind, and decided that she did want to go on the record.
Roberta Petz: Okay, all right. Brenna Farrell: Yeah, so. Brenna Farrell: With me on a phone call. Brenna Farrell: Would you mind just telling us who you are, your name and introduction? Roberta Petz: Okay.
Brenna Farrell: Susan was the girl from Chicago, she was a college student who'd gone missing while she was camping with her boyfriend, and she's who Armani and Belge found in the mine.
Brenna Farrell: You know, as I've explained before, my interest really in this story has to do with the fact that it seems that it's become sort of a key part of how a lot of legal ethics classes talk about the concept of confidentiality, and so I sort of wanted to just start with that idea, to ask if that's something that you knew that law schools were teaching and if you had any feelings or thoughts about that.
Roberta Petz: I had no idea that this was being taught in law schools, and I'm pretty horrified to think that this is what is considered to be correct.
Because I don't think it's ethical at all, and to think it's being taught as the right way to do things in an ethical class is totally incomprehensible to me.
Brenna Farrell: And was the first that you'd heard that it was being taught when I reached out to you? Roberta Petz: Yes. Roberta Petz: Yes, you were the only, in talking to you did I know that, yes. Maybe they ought to think not only about the criminal who they're trying to defend, but what about the victims?
And I think that that should at least be an equal thought in their mind, if not a greater consideration. Brenna Farrell: Did you have a feeling that you really weren't taken into consideration as all of this was happening? Roberta Petz: Yes, and only my husband and I, when we first heard that she was missing, we flew immediately in and went to the police station.
And when we were there, sitting with the policemen, they received The policemen at the time, that we were with, received a phone call that Danny's And that's all we knew, and we never really had any updates, and nobody told us what was going on, and obviously there was no closure and it was just getting worse and worse.
Roberta Petz: And then the only other time we were contacted by the police was, or some authority, I can't even remember who, was when my daughter's body was found like five months later. And in the meantime of course we were all going crazy. My father, as a matter of fact, even went so far as to contact a psychic. That's how important it was and how it was our entire lives during that period, and as far as visiting the lawyer, which my husband did, it was a totally lie.
The lawyer, maybe he considered it to be ethical, but what he was doing was lying to my husband and causing us more months of horror. Roberta Petz: And this is what is being taught in law schools. So anyway. Brenna Farrell: Just to try to be fair to everyone involved, as far as I've encountered, anyone, law professors, law students, when they approach this it's with a lot of sensitivity and they are struggling with the pain.
I think the instinct is to side with the families and to imagine what they went through, but my feeling is that how could any of us possibly imagine that if we hadn't gone through it? And so I guess that's why I was hoping to talk to you, to kind of let you have a chance to communicate some of that experience. Roberta Petz: Yeah, well, it's impossible to really communicate in words. I mean, 40 years later, I'm still It's still a struggle to discuss this, because it'll never go away as long as I live, so.
Brenna Farrell: I don't know, I guess I'm wondering, we've been talking a lot of sad stuff. I'm wondering if there's anything you would like to say about Susan that doesn't have to do with any of this, that you would want people to know?
That you'd want to share, I don't You don't have to, but Roberta Petz: Well, what can I say. She did receive her degree posthumously. We didn't go and pick it up at Boston University, it was too difficult for us. And Danny, who was her boyfriend, had been just that summer and he had a full scholarship to Harvard and he had graduated just the year before.
So two lives, and I'm sure the other two children had great futures ahead of them too, and it's just a horrible tragedy. It's horrible, you know? To be in their position. To have to live through that, I mean how do you relate losing your daughter, you know? What excuse is there for it, to protecting the person that killed her? There's no justification, you couldn't justify it in my mind. I don't expect them to accept it.
Brenna Farrell: I'm gonna get just a minute of silence up here, if that's okay. Brenna Farrell: Okay. I can hear the echoes of dogs down the mountain, things tend to travel up the hill and kind of bounce around. That water, I think it's from deeper down in there dripping, I can't tell where it's dripping, everything up here is frozen solid so I'm not sure what that is. But I think I'm going to turn back around now.
I sort of wish I'd brought some flowers or something. Brenna Farrell: All right. The working title is Twisted Soul.
Also to Laurence Gooley, the author of Terror in the Adirondacks. Clark D. Speaker Start of message. Radiolab is produced by Jad Abumrad. Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design. Soren Wheeler is senior editor. Jamie York is our senior producer.
Our fact checkers are [Eva Dasher ] and Michelle Harris. Speaker End of message. NYPR Network. Listen Now Become A Member. Robert Krulwich: I'm Robert Krulwich. Robert Krulwich: This is Lisa Lerman. Brenna Farrell: Day One- frank armani: One, a school teacher had assaulted his child, he wanted to sue the school, and I talked him out of it. Brenna Farrell: Yeah. Brenna Farrell: Wow. Brenna Farrell: Right. Robert Krulwich: So now what does he do?
Robert Krulwich: We'll be right back. Brenna Farrell: Well, so they decided to- frank armani: Plea bargain. Lisa Lerman: To take this information to the prosecutor and say- Brenna Farrell: I have information that will help you solve some cases.
Robert Krulwich: "Some cases. Jim Tracy: And to back up a little ways- Brenna Farrell: When that deal fell apart that was actually, that was particularly devastating for Armani because just the day before He says- frank armani: No. So after that, Armani said his mother, she'd be up at night crying, she would go to bed at night- frank armani: And my mother would wake up screaming, "The fish are eating him.
Robert Krulwich: Did he ever break? Brenna Farrell: Begins. Speaker Today in a surprise announcement, Robert Garrow's defense attorney- Brenna Farrell: Because they had this duty to protect their client's secrets. Speaker There is just no way in the world you're going to convince your average non-lawyer- Jim Tracy: Everybody turned against them. His wife finds an unlit Molotov cocktail in the backyard, he started to carry a- frank armani: Pistol on my back.
0コメント